DSpace

DSpace at RU >    University Library >    Academic bibliography >

SFX Query

Title: A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis.
Author(s): Santvoort, H.C. van
Besselink, M.G.
Bakker, O.J.
Hofker, H.S.
Boermeester, M.A.
Dejong, C.H.
Goor, H. van (14543754X)
Schaapherder, A.F.
Eijck, C.H. van
Bollen, T.L.
Ramshorst, B. van
Nieuwenhuijs, V.B.
Timmer, R.
Lameris, J.S.
Kruyt, P.M.
Manusama, E.R.
Harst, E. van der
Schelling, G.P. van der
Karsten, T.
Hesselink, E.J.
Laarhoven, C.J.H.M. van (124433510)
Rosman, C. (148956173)
Bosscha, K.
Wit, R.J. de
Houdijk, A.P.
Leeuwen, M.S. van
Buskens, E.
Gooszen, H.G. (070527385)
Publication year: 2010
Document type: Article / Letter to editor
Journal: New England Journal of Medicine
ISSN: 0028-4793
Volume: vol. 362
Issue: iss. 16
Start page: p. 1491
End page: p. 1502
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Necrotizing pancreatitis with infected necrotic tissue is associated with a high rate of complications and death. Standard treatment is open necrosectomy. The outcome may be improved by a minimally invasive step-up approach. METHODS: In this multicenter study, we randomly assigned 88 patients with necrotizing pancreatitis and suspected or confirmed infected necrotic tissue to undergo primary open necrosectomy or a step-up approach to treatment. The step-up approach consisted of percutaneous drainage followed, if necessary, by minimally invasive retroperitoneal necrosectomy. The primary end point was a composite of major complications (new-onset multiple-organ failure or multiple systemic complications, perforation of a visceral organ or enterocutaneous fistula, or bleeding) or death. RESULTS: The primary end point occurred in 31 of 45 patients (69%) assigned to open necrosectomy and in 17 of 43 patients (40%) assigned to the step-up approach (risk ratio with the step-up approach, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.38 to 0.87; P=0.006). Of the patients assigned to the step-up approach, 35% were treated with percutaneous drainage only. New-onset multiple-organ failure occurred less often in patients assigned to the step-up approach than in those assigned to open necrosectomy (12% vs. 40%, P=0.002). The rate of death did not differ significantly between groups (19% vs. 16%, P=0.70). Patients assigned to the step-up approach had a lower rate of incisional hernias (7% vs. 24%, P=0.03) and new-onset diabetes (16% vs. 38%, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: A minimally invasive step-up approach, as compared with open necrosectomy, reduced the rate of the composite end point of major complications or death among patients with necrotizing pancreatitis and infected necrotic tissue. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN13975868.)
Subject: IGMD 2: Molecular gastro-enterology and hepatology
NCEBP 2: Evaluation of complex medical interventions
Organization: UMCN Extern
Surgery
Operating Rooms
Appears in Collections:Academic bibliography

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2066/87299

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

  DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2011  Duraspace - Feedback