|
|
DSpace at RU >
University Library >
Academic bibliography >
|
| Title: | Comparison of GP5+/6+-PCR and SPF10-line blot assays for detection of high-risk human papillomavirus in samples from women with normal cytology results who develop grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. |
| Author(s): | Hesselink, A.T. Ham, M.A.P.C. van (298975998) Heideman, D.A. Groothuismink, Z.M. Rozendaal, L. Berkhof, J. Kemenade, F.J. van Massuger, L.A. Melchers, W.J.G. (074709771) Meijer, C.J. Snijders, P.J.L.M. |
| Publication year: | 2008 |
| Document type: | Article / Letter to editor |
| Journal: | Journal of Clinical Microbiology |
| ISSN: | 0095-1137 |
| Volume: | vol. 46 |
| Issue: | iss. 10 |
| Start page: | p. 3215 |
| End page: | p. 3221 |
| Abstract: | Using a case control approach, we performed a two-way comparison study between GP5+/6+-PCR and HPV SPF(10)-Line Blot 25 (SPF(10)) assays for detection of 14 types of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) in samples from women with normal cytology results who had or developed grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 3). Samples were pooled from two cohorts, i.e., women participating in population-based screening and women attending a gynecological outpatient clinic. Cases (n = 45) were women with histologically confirmed CIN 3 diagnosed within a median follow-up time of 2.7 (range, 0.2 to 7.9) years. Control samples were from women (n = 264) who had developed CIN 1 lesions at maximum (median follow-up at 5.8 [range, 0 to 10] years). Identical numbers of cases tested positive for 1 or more of the 14 hrHPV types by both systems (40/45; McNemar; P = 1.0). Conversely, SPF(10) scored significantly more controls as hrHPV positive than did GP5+/6+-PCR (95/264 versus 29/264; McNemar; P < 0.001). Consequently, women with normal cytology results and an hrHPV GP5+/6+-PCR-positive test exhibited a risk of CIN 3 that was 4.5 times higher (odds ratio [OR], 65; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 24 to 178) than that seen for women with an hrHPV-positive SPF(10) test (OR, 14; 95%CI, 5 to 38)). Similar results were obtained after analysis of both cohorts separately. Discrepancy analysis by viral load assessment for the most common discordant hrHPV types (HPV16, -18, and -52) showed that samples which were SPF(10) positive only for these types had viral loads significantly lower than those for samples that were positive by both assays (analysis of variance; P < or = 0.006). Our data indicate that GP5+/6+-PCR has a better clinical performance than SPF(10) for women who are diagnosed with CIN 3 after prior normal cytology results. The extra positivity scored by SPF(10) mainly involved infections characterized by low viral loads that do not result in CIN 3. |
| Subject: | UMCN 1.4: Immunotherapy, gene therapy and transplantation UMCN 4.1: Microbial pathogenesis and host defense |
| Organization: | UMCN Extern Obstetrics and Gynaecology Medical Microbiology |
| Appears in Collections: | Academic bibliography
|
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2066/71009
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|
|