|
|
DSpace at RU >
University Library >
Academic bibliography >
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format |
| publisher's version | 917.57 kB | Adobe PDF | Under Embargo
|
|
| Title: | Arm raising at exposure-controlled multidetector trauma CT of thoracoabdominal region: higher image quality, lower radiation dose. |
| Author(s): | Brink, M. (274712180) Lange, F de Oostveen, L.J. Dekker, H.M. (298979055) Kool, D.R. (298983222) Deunk, J. (314660496) Edwards, M.J.R. (236181491) Kuijk, C van Kamman, R.L. (072820233) Blickman, J.G. (080434274) |
| Publication year: | 2008 |
| Document type: | Article / Letter to editor |
| Journal: | Radiology |
| ISSN: | 0033-8419 |
| Volume: | vol. 249 |
| Issue: | iss. 2 |
| Start page: | p. 661 |
| End page: | p. 670 |
| Abstract: | PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of arm position on image quality and effective radiation dose in an automatic exposure-controlled (AEC) multidetector thoracoabdominal computed tomography (CT) protocol in trauma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study of the data of 177 trauma patients (117 male; median age, 39 years) was approved by the institutional ethics board, with informed patient consent waived. Patients underwent scanning by using an AEC 16-detector thoracoabdominal CT protocol in which both arms were raised above the shoulder region (standard-position group, 132 patients), one arm was raised and the other was down (one-arm group, 27 patients), or both arms were down (two-arm group, 18 patients). Objective and subjective image quality was assessed. Individual effective radiation dose was calculated from the effective tube current-time product per exposed section. For this purpose, section location-dependent conversion factors were derived by using a CT dosimetry calculator. The effect of arm position on effective dose was quantified by using linear regression analysis with correction for patient volume and attenuation. RESULTS: Compared with the image quality in the standard-position group, the image quality in the one- and two-arm groups was decreased but within acceptable diagnostic limits. The median corrected effective dose in the standard-position group was 18.6 mSv; the dose in the one-arm group was 18% (95% confidence interval: 11%, 25%) higher than this, and that in the two-arm group was 45% (95% confidence interval: 34%, 57%) higher. CONCLUSION: Omitting arm raising results in lower but acceptable image quality and a substantially higher effective radiation dose. Hence, effort should be made to position the arms above the shoulder when scanning trauma patients. Clinical trial registration no. NCT00228111. |
| Subject: | UMCN 1.1: Functional Imaging UMCN 4.3: Tissue engineering and reconstructive surgery |
| Organization: | Surgery |
| Appears in Collections: | Academic bibliography
|
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2066/69921
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|
|