DSpace

DSpace at RU >    University Library >    Academic bibliography >

SFX Query

Title: Age at diagnosis is a determinant factor of renal cell carcinoma-specific survival in patients treated with nephrectomy.
Author(s): Karakiewicz, P.I.
Jeldres, C.
Suardi, N.
Hutterer, G.C.
Perrotte, P.
Capitanio, U.
Ficarra, V.
Cindolo, L.
Taille, A de la
Tostain, J.
Mulders, P.F.A. (106661302)
Salomon, L.
Zigeuner, R.
Schips, L.
Chautard, D.
Valeri, A.
Lechevallier, E.
Descots, J.L.
Lang, H.
Mejean, A.
Verhoest, G.
Patard, J.J.
Publication year: 2008
Document type: Article / Letter to editor
Journal: Canadian Urological Association Journal
ISSN: 1911-6470
Volume: vol. 2
Issue: iss. 6
Start page: p. 610
End page: p. 617
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Based on combined data for 4880 patients, 2 previous studies reported that advanced age is a predictor of increased renal cell carcinoma-specific mortality (RCC-SM). We explored the effect of age in cubic spline analyses to identify the age groups with the most elevated risk for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: Our study included 3595 patients from 14 European centres who had partial or radical nephrectomies. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to compile life tables, and we performed Cox regression analyses to assess RCC-SM. Covariates included age at diagnosis, sex, TNM (tumour, node, metastasis) stage, tumour size, Fuhrman grade, symptom classification and histological subtype. RESULTS: Age ranged from 10 to 89 (mean 63, median 67) years. The median duration of follow-up was 2.9 years. The median survival for the cohort was 13.4 years. Stage distribution was as follows: 1915 patients (53.3%) had stage I disease, 388 (10.8%) had stage II, 895 (24.9%) had stage III and 397 (11.0%) had stage IV disease. In multivariate analyses, we coded age at diagnosis as a cubic spline, and it achieved independent predictor status (p < 0.001). The risk of RCC-SM was lowest among patients younger than 50 years. We observed an increase in RCC-SM until the age of 50, at which point the level of risk reached a plateau. We observed a second increase among patients aged 75-89 years. We found similar patterns when we stratified patients according to the 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stages. CONCLUSION: The effect of age shows prognostic significance and indicates that follow-up and possibly secondary treatments might need to be adjusted according to the age of the patient.
Subject: UMCN 1.2: Molecular diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring
Organization: Urology
Appears in Collections:Academic bibliography

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2066/69586

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

  DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2011  Duraspace - Feedback