Evaluation of the subjective effect of middle ear implantation in hearing-impaired patients with severe external otitis.

Abstract

The subjective benefit of middle ear implantation was studied in a group of 23 hearing-impaired patients who could not use conventional hearing aids owing to severe chronic external otitis. Changes in hearing disability (Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit [APHAB]) and changes in quality of life (Glasgow Benefit Inventory [GBI]) were determined. Mean benefit value on the APHAB for the subscale Ease of Communication was close to the mean reference value for conventional hearing aids. For the subscales Reverberation and Background Noise, a poorer result was found. Individual analysis of the APHAB scores showed significant benefit in 12 out of the 23 patients. According to the GBI, 16 out of 17 patients reported that middle ear implantation had made a positive impact on their quality of life. It is concluded that middle ear implantation has a positive effect on hearing difficulties and quality of life in hearing-impaired subjects who cannot use conventional devices. The APHAB outcomes were not better than those reported for conventional devices.