DSpace

DSpace at RU >    University Library >    Academic bibliography >

SFX Query

Title: What is the appropriate screening protocol in Lynch syndrome?
Author(s): Jong, A.E. de
Nagengast, F.M. (073940569)
Kleibeuker, J.H.
Meeberg, P.C. van de
Wijk, H.J. van
Cats, A.
Griffioen, G.
Vasen, H.F.
Publication year: 2006
Document type: Article / Letter to editor
Journal: Familial Cancer
ISSN: 1389-9600
Volume: vol. 5
Issue: iss. 4
Start page: p. 373
End page: p. 378
Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Lynch syndrome families have a substantial risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC). The recommended surveillance protocol includes colonoscopy every 2 years from age 20-25 years. It is yet unknown whether annual screening of patients aged 40-60 years is more effective than bi-annual screening, whether patients who had an adenoma removed should be re-examined after a year and whether surveillance of second-degree relatives is indicated. The aim of this study was to address these issues. METHODS: All carriers of a mismatch repair gene mutation who participated in the surveillance program were selected from the Dutch Lynch syndrome registry. The results of colonoscopy were prospectively collected. RESULTS: A total of 666 mutation carriers were identified in 110 families. Fourty-one CRCs were detected during endoscopic follow-up, of which 34 (83%) were diagnosed between age 40 and 60 years. In five of 34 patients, CRC was diagnosed within 1 year after colonoscopy, eight cancers were diagnosed between 1 and 2 years and the remaining tumors more than 2 years after colonoscopy. All eight CRCs detected between 1 and 2 years were at local stage. At least one adenoma was diagnosed at 141 examinations. The risk of developing CRC during follow-up in carriers with an adenoma was similar as in carriers without an adenoma at the previous colonoscopy. 280 parent-child couples with at least one Lynch syndrome-related carcinoma were identified in 110 families. In only 19 (6.8%) of these couples, CRC developed earlier in the child than an Lynch syndrome-associated cancer in the parent. CONCLUSION: The current surveillance protocol, i.e., bi-annual colonoscopy in first-degree relatives independent of age and endoscopic findings, appears to be appropriate.
Subject: UMCN 1.2: Molecular diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring
Organization: UMCN Extern
Gastroenterology
Appears in Collections:Academic bibliography

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2066/51183

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

  DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2011  Duraspace - Feedback