Fulltext:
141338.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
250.7Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Source
Town Planning Review, 74, 3, (2003), pp. 315-330ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Planologie, ihb lokale en reg. ruimtelijke beleid
Journal title
Town Planning Review
Volume
vol. 74
Issue
iss. 3
Page start
p. 315
Page end
p. 330
Subject
Innovations in Spatial and Environmental GovernanceAbstract
This paper takes a di erent perspective on the market versus government debate. This debate is often too general, too political and not fruitful. Starting from the assumption that many actors make decisions about changes in land use and that those decisions have to be coordinated in some ways, three models of
coordination (market, hierarchy and network) are identi®ed. These models, which in practice are often mixed, represent di erent ways of coordinating decisions about changing the content of user rights and/or changing the
ownership of user rights in order to change land use. Which model is `best’ cannot be determined in general, but has to be evaluated by comparing the performance of user rights regimes.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [238430]
- Electronic publications [122512]
- Nijmegen School of Management [18274]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.